La mejor calidad desde 1998

· Social desirability size (EDS-20; Almiro ainsi que al ·

Social desirability size (EDS-20; Almiro ainsi que al

Social desirability size (EDS-20; Almiro ainsi que al

Public Desirability Measure

, 2016) is a self-report size, having 20 items of dichotomous effect (yes/no), verified on age range in this test. Example activities become “Perhaps you have detested individuals?” and you will “Perhaps you have taken advantage of some one?” Before investigation analyses, all the players was indeed processed having social desirability, ruling aside kids just who obtained more M = , as they showed a propensity to aired socially preferred solutions instead than simply going for solutions that are a genuine reflection of their behaviors or thoughts (Grimm, 2010). Cronbach’s alpha to own complete level are.80.

Abusive Sexting

Teenagers was indeed asked several questions about sexting behavior: (a) abusive sexting: “Have you common intimately direct photo or videos regarding other anyone without the agree?”; and (b) abusive sexting victimization: “Keeps sexually specific photo otherwise films off oneself ever before been common with others in the place of your own consent?.” Answers was indeed rated as 0 = Zero, step 1 = Sure.

Teens Thinking Report

Young people notice report (YSR; Achenbach and Rescorla, 2001; Portuguese version: Goncalves mais aussi al., 2007). The latest YSR are a personal-report survey available for college-years pupils and adolescents (age 11?18) to obtain care about-ratings regarding emotional, behavioral, and you will societal issues. Goods are ranked on good about three-section scale (0 = not the case, 1 = some or sometimes correct, and you may dos = most evident otherwise commonly correct), based on the before half a year. Inside data, the brand new syndromes Stressed/Depression (13 products; elizabeth.grams., “I believe meaningless or inferior”; ? = 0.85), Social Problems (eleven activities; e.g., “I don’t get along with almost every other kids”; ? = 0.78), Opposition (Laws Cracking) Choices (16 situations; elizabeth.g., “We cut kinds otherwise skip college or university”; ? = 0.60), and you will Competitive Conclusion (17 affairs; e.g ., “I ruin one thing belonging to anybody else”; ? = 0.84) were used. Depending on the conditions advised because of the Ponterotto and you can Ruckdeschel (2007) regarding the adequacy out-of internal texture measures, and because of the marginal leader value of Opposition Choices subscale (? = 0.60) and also the amount of points (16 activities), i decided to eradicate it level regarding mathematical analysis.

List regarding Callous-Unemotional Qualities

Inventory off callous-unemotional attributes [ICU; Essau mais aussi al., 2006; Portuguese variation of the Pechorro mais aussi al. (2014)]. Brand new ICU are a questionnaire made to assess callous and you will unemotional qualities into the an effective cuatro-section measure anywhere between 0 (“Not true”) to three (“Needless to say correct”). This level has been utilized that have logical and you may neighborhood examples of young people between early puberty in order to later adolescence/growing adulthood (age groups = 12–two decades). Three subscales were utilized: Uncaring (eight activities; age.g., “I hide my personal thinking of anyone else”; ? = 0.86), Callousness (11 factors; elizabeth.grams., “I really don’t care exactly who We hurt to acquire the thing i want”; ? = 0.72), and you can Unemotional (four things; “I feel crappy or responsible when i make a move wrong”; ? = 0.43). Regardless if a minimal value of leader would-be on account of a good low level of questions (Nunnally, 1978), we chose to reduce so it level from relative statistical investigation.

Teens Shock Survey

Youth injury survey [CTQ; Bernstein et al., 2003; Portuguese type because of the Dias ainsi que al. (2013)]. The new CTQ is a beneficial twenty-eight-items questionnaire aligned so you can assess care about-reported young people upheaval background in adolescent and you will adult communities (from a dozen years of age). Answers are measured with the an effective 5-area Likert scale mode 1 (“Never genuine”) to 5 (“Very often correct”). Teens upheaval was counted using five subscales: Emotional abuse (elizabeth.g., “I imagined you to my parents desired I’d never been born”; ? = 0.81), Mental overlook (age.g., “I sensed cherished”; ? = 0.82), Intimate discipline (age.g., “I do believe that we is actually sexually mistreated”; ? = 0.89), Physical discipline (e.g., “I believe that we is actually yourself abused”; ? = 0.83), and you will Real overlook (age.grams., “There isn’t sufficient to eat”; ? = 0.60). Per subscale consists of four issues, and you may an additional around three goods are intended to measure one tendency to attenuate or refuse the new abuse.

Deja un comentario

Tu dirección de correo electrónico no será publicada.

Quesos Anahuac © 2022